calder-v-jones
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-7868 | Lee Michael Pederson v. Phillip Frost, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2022-05-13 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | calder-v-jones civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction intentional-interference personal-jurisdiction venue-transfer witness-tampering | Does Minnesota have the power to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over Respondents/Defendants Phillip Frost and CoCrystal Pharma, Inc. under Co… |
| 20-342 | Kyko Global Inc., et al. v. Omkar Bhongir | Third Circuit | 2020-09-15 | Denied | Response Waived | calder-effects-test calder-v-jones civil-procedure corporate-directors due-process effects-test personal-jurisdiction rule-12b2 state-law walden-v-fiore | (1) Whether Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277 (2014) nullifies Pennsylvania statute 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 5322(a)(7)(iv) and similar statutes and rules from oth… |
| 19-910 | K. G. S., Individually and as Guardian and Next Friend of Baby Doe, a Minor Child v. Facebook, Inc. | Alabama | 2020-01-22 | Denied | calder-effects-test calder-v-jones due-process effects-based-test fourteenth-amendment online-activity personal-jurisdiction reputational-harm virtual-contacts walden-v-fiore | Whether, under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, virtual contacts can establish specific personal … |