No. 20-342
Kyko Global Inc., et al. v. Omkar Bhongir
Response Waived
Tags: calder-effects-test calder-v-jones civil-procedure corporate-directors due-process effects-test personal-jurisdiction rule-12b2 state-law walden-v-fiore
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Whether Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277 (2014)
nullifies Pennsylvania statute 42 Pa. C.S.A.
§ 5322(a)(7)(iv) and similar statutes and
rules from other jurisdictions—which asserts
personal jurisdiction over corporate directors
regarding a cause of action related to the person's directorship?
(2) Whether a defendant must legally support his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) motion by identifying
the specific legal basis that allegedly demonstrates lack of personal jurisdiction before the
burden shifts to a plaintiff to produce jurisdictional evidence in response to a Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(2) motion.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Walden v. Fiore nullifies state personal-jurisdiction-statutes
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-12
Waiver of right of respondent Omkar Bhongir to respond filed.
2020-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Kyko Global Inc., et al.
Jayson Matthew Macyda — Kyko Global Inc. and Affiliates, Petitioner
Omkar Bhongir
Laura Ann Lange — Laura Lange, Respondent