| 20-1088 |
David Carson, as Parent and Next Friend of O. C., et al. v. A. Pender Makin |
First Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (55)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
constitutional-rights equal-protection espinoza-v-montana first-amendment first-circuit religion-clauses sectarian-instruction student-aid-program |
Does a state violate the Religion Clauses or Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution by prohibiting students participating in an oth… |
69.5 |
| 19-1401 |
April Hughes, et al. v. Northwestern University, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
CVSGAmici (14)Relisted (3) |
breach-of-duty circuit-split defined-contribution defined-contribution-plan erisa erisa-fiduciary-duty excessive-fees fiduciary-duty lower-cost-alternatives prudence prudence-standard retirement-plan |
Whether allegations that a defined-contribution retirement plan paid or charged its participants fees that substantially exceeded fees for alternative… |
45.5 |
| 22O143 |
Mississippi, Plaintiff v. Tennessee, City of Memphis, Tennessee, and Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division |
|
Dismissed |
CVSGAmici (5)Relisted (6) |
None |
|
33.0 |
| 20-1374 |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al. v. John Doe, One, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Granted |
Amici (21)Relisted (2) |
affordable-care-act antidiscrimination-statute civil-rights disability-discrimination disparate-impact health-insurance insurance patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act rehabilitation-act |
1. Whether section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and by extension the ACA, provides a disparate-impact cause of action for plaintiffs alleging disabi… |
32.0 |
| 20-1114 |
American Hospital Association, et al. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (15)Relisted (3) |
administrative-law chevron-deference healthcare-regulation hospital-acquisition-cost medicare medicare-reimbursement reimbursement-rates statutory-interpretation survey-data |
Under federal law, the reimbursement rate paid by Medicare for specified covered outpatient drugs is set based on one of two alternative payment metho… |
26.5 |
| 20-1066 |
Ashlyn Hoggard v. Ron Rhodes, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (8) |
case-precedent circuit-split constitutional-rights factual-similarity first-amendment higher-standard legal-standard public-university qualified-immunity |
1. Whether qualified immunity shields public university officials from liability when the reasoning—but not the holding—of a binding decision gave the… |
20.0 |
| 20-1541 |
Pivotal Software, Inc., et al. v. Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, et al. |
California |
Granted |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
discovery-stay federal-court private-action reform-act securities-act securities-litigation state-court |
Whether the Reform Act's discovery-stay provision applies to a private action under the Securities Act in state or federal court, or solely to a priva… |
19.5 |
| 19-793 |
Institute for Free Speech v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California |
Ninth Circuit |
GVR |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
civil-rights compelled-disclosure donor-disclosure exacting-scrutiny first-amendment free-speech nonprofit nonprofit-association standing state-action strict-scrutiny |
1. Whether a state official's demand for all significant donors to a nonprofit organization, as a precondition to engaging in constitutionally-protect… |
18.0 |
| 20-1263 |
Gianinna Gallardo, an Incapacitated Person, By and Through Her Parents and Co-Guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo v. Simone Marstiller, In Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration |
Eleventh Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (5)Relisted (2) |
beneficiary-rights federal-statute future-medical-expenses healthcare-reimbursement medicaid-act medicaid-recovery medical-expenses preemption reimbursement statutory-interpretation tort-recovery tort-settlement |
Whether the federal Medicaid Act provides for a state Medicaid program to recover reimbursement for Medicaid's payment of a beneficiary's past medical… |
16.0 |
| 20-1459 |
United States v. Justin Eugene Taylor |
Fourth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (5)Relisted (2) |
attempted-robbery crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process federal-criminal-law federal-jurisdiction hobbs-act sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation violent-crime |
Whether 18 U.S.C. 924(¢)(3)(A)'s definition of "crime of violence" excludes attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951(a). |
16.0 |
| 20-1084 |
Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections v. Matthew Reeves |
Eleventh Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (1)Relisted (8) |
aedpa aedpa-standard comity federal-review federalism habeas-corpus habeas-review ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel state-court-deference strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
The question presented is whether the Eleventh Circuit violated § 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court. |
15.0 |
| 20-1214 |
Fred J. Eychaner v. City of Chicago, Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
blight due-process eminent-domain future-blight kelo-precedent kelo-v-city-of-new-london pretext property-rights public-use public-use-clause takings takings-clause |
1. Is the possibility of futwre blight a permissible basis for a government to take property in an unblighted area and give it to a private party for … |
15.0 |
| 20-322 |
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. v. Esteban Aleman Gonzalez, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (4)Relisted (2) |
administrative-law bond-hearing danger-to-community due-process flight-risk immigration-detention statutory-interpretation |
Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government … |
15.0 |
| 20-1312 |
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Empire Health Foundation, for Valley Hospital Medical Center |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (3)Relisted (2) |
health-and-human-services hospital-adjustment low-income-patients medicaid-fraction medicare-fraction medicare-statute statutory-interpretation supplemental-security-income |
Whether the Secretary has permissibly included in a hospital's Medicare fraction all of the hospital's patient days of individuals who satisfy the req… |
14.0 |
| 19-896 |
Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. v. Antonio Arteaga-Martinez |
Third Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Relisted (3) |
administrative-law bond-hearing clear-and-convincing-evidence due-process flight-risk immigration-detention immigration-law statutory-interpretation |
Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government … |
11.5 |
| 20-1063 |
Shkelzën Berisha v. Guy Lawson, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
actual-malice constitutional-law curtis-publishing-co-v-butts defamation first-amendment libel libel-law mckee-v-cosby public-figure |
The question presented is whether this Court should overrule the "actual malice" requirement it imposed on public figure defamation plaintiffs. |
10.0 |
| 20-1486 |
Empire Health Foundation, for Valley Hospital Medical Center v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
administrative-law agency-rulemaking disproportionate-share-hospital disproportionate-share-hospital-payments due-process logical-outgrowth medicare medicare-payments notice-and-comment |
1) Whether agencies must accurately include key facts and data in notices of proposed rulemaking in order to satisfy the requirements of fair notice a… |
6.0 |
| 20-7028 |
Amos Mast, et al. v. Fillmore County, Minnesota, et al. |
Minnesota |
GVR |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (9)IFP |
compelling-interest government-interest judicial-review least-restrictive-alternative religious-freedom rluipa strict-scrutiny |
(1) When applying strict scrutiny under RLUIPA, can lower courts rely upon an admission that an interest is compelling generally, or must they require… |
3.5 |