Whether a United States District Court judge may dismiss a
civil rights employment discrimination case on procedural
technicalities without granting:
A jury trial as requested under Rule 38,
A hearing on a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)
despite documented indigency and medical hardship,
Appointment of counsel,
and
A full hearing on religious accommodation, constitutional
violations (First and Fourteenth Amendments), and EEOC
findings — all in contravention of Caperton v. Massey,
Haines v. Kerner, and Henderson v. United States?

Whether a United States District Court judge may dismiss a civil rights employment discrimination case on procedural technicalities without granting: A jury trial as requested under Rule 38, A hearing on a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) despite documented indigency and medical hardship, Appointment of counsel, and A full hearing on religious accommodation, constitutional violations (First and Fourteenth Amendments), and EEOC findings — all in contravention of Caperton v. Massey, Haines v. Kerner, and Henderson v. United States?