No. 24-890

Richard Lee Rynn v. Craig Jennings, Judge, Avondale City Court, et al.

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2025-02-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights evidence-standard ex-parte-injunction labor-dispute title-vii workplace-rights
Latest Conference: 2025-06-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does the legal standard of evidence require a
showing of imminent harm to justify the
issuance of an ex parte injunction without
notice?

2. Are employees legally protected from a work
place injunction based on a labor dispute without
authorization of the workplace and under actions
directed by employer?

3. Is a workplace injunction void for not following
labor rights protections required by Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act and EEOC including the
right to disclosure?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the legal standard of evidence require a showing of imminent harm to justify the issuance of an ex parte injunction without notice?

Docket Entries

2025-06-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent First Transit, Inc. and Patrick Camunez to respond filed.
2024-10-11
2024-08-02
Application (24A121) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 11, 2024.
2024-07-27
Application (24A121) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 12, 2024 to October 11, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

City of Avondale, Craig Jennings
Stephen Mark KempOffice of the City Attorney, City of Avondale, Respondent
First Transit, Inc. and Patrick Camunez
Kimberly M. ShappleyLittler Mesndelson, P.C., Respondent
Richard Rynn
Richard Rynn — Petitioner