Jeanna Norris, et al. v. Samuel L. Stanley, Jr., in His Official Capacity as President of Michigan State University, et al.
Whether Jacobson v. Massachusetts , 197 U.S. 11 (1905) , when read in light of this Court's later acknowledgment that the right to refuse treatment is "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition," requires that governmental actions which oblige individuals to submit to intrusive medical procedures on pain of penalties such as losing public employment must be subject to heightened scrutiny, and if so, whether Respondents' Covid vaccine mandate fail ed this test?
Whether Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), when read in light of this Court's later acknowledgment that the right to refuse treatment is 'deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition,' requires that governmental actions which oblige individuals to submit to intrusive medical procedures on pain of penalties such as losing public employment must be subject to heightened scrutiny, and if so, whether Respondents' Covid vaccine mandate failed this test?