No. 21-123
Marguerite T. Martin v. Teleperformance Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights disability disability-rights employment employment-discrimination medical-condition privacy reasonable-accommodation security-breach termination wrongful-termination
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
• The plaintiff/Appellant act of committing a security breach were not mentioned throughout the case.
* Symptoms of the Plaintiff/Appellant's anemia condition were not considered a disability, on the day of the incident, that allegedly resulted in the security breach that led towards her employment termination with the business.
• Privacy concerns after the termination was not considered a major factor although information presented in the case suggested otherwise.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the plaintiff's anemia condition and privacy concerns were properly considered in the termination of her employment due to a security breach
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent TPUSA, Inc. to respond filed.
2021-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Marguerite Martin
Marguerite T. Martin — Petitioner
TPUSA, Inc.
Kristen M. Fiore — Akerman LLP, Respondent