Jiping Rizk v. Defense Finance and Accounting Service
In the United State, there are no institution or no law to correct the illegal act by the Security Clearance?
This case is simply only a matter of language problem, either the Supervisor 'English is not good or Plaintiff English is not good. He fired her only did not write down China as foreign country. The plaintiff was bom in China. U.S. law stipulates that if a baby is bom in the U.S, who is a U.S. citizen. She homed in China, how can you say that China is foreign country to her?
And she diligently worked for the DFAS more than six years, and she every year got reward and she did not do any mistake take and she has two degrees, and she is a recognized permanent employee. After he fired her than tell her that he do not fire her ask her to quit her job by her self, she did not quit her job, becouse she did not do any thing wrong.
Plaintiff love America and she believes that America will give her the reasonable judgment in her case. God Bless America.
Whether the termination of the plaintiff's employment was unlawful due to language barriers and lack of due process