No. 20-1533

Carline M. Curry v. City of Mansfield, Ohio, et al.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2021-05-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-rights discrimination employment-discrimination employment-practices job-vacancy ohio-revised-code retaliation title-vii
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Should Plaintiff Curry been given and Opportunity for
Reemployment as other similarly situated employees upon
retirement excluding the fact that she filed discriminatory
charges against the City under 42 U.S.C 2000 ( e )2, 42 U.S.C
2000 ( e ) 3 and Ohio Revised Code 4112.02: sections 703 of
Title VH and Section 704 of Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964

2. The Plant Managers job became vacant and Bob Coker and
I both applied. They gave the job to Bob. Bob previously held
the Operations Supervisor Job: which I was qualified for. The
City chose to not fill the position so that I would not have an
opportunity to apply because they knew I was qualified. I have
a Class ID Wastewater License and a Class n Lab Analyst
Certification. In the History of the Plant for the last 33 years
there has never
Been a vacancy in that position it was always filled. The City
later trained the Environmental Compliance Supervisor (the
job I did for 30 years and the City denied me an opportunity
for rehire) for a year and gave her the job without posting it.
Should Plaintiff Curry been given an opportunity for
the Operations Supervisor Job and was it not filled
due to retaliation?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should Plaintiff Curry been given an Opportunity for Reemployment

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2021)

Attorneys

Carline M. Curry
Carline M. Curry — Petitioner