No. 19-8369
LaLangie Hoskins v. GE Aviation
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: ada-title-i americans-with-disabilities-act disability disability-discrimination due-process employment-discrimination employment-law protected-class standing trial-procedure wrongful-termination
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the district court abused its discretion by relying on the erroneous legal premise that the Plaintiff is not part of the protected class of citizens?
How is being wrongfully terminated for the Plaintiff's disability not a violation of Title I of the ADA in comparison to similar cases?
Assuming the Court somehow erred in its judgment just a few months prior to trial, did the court deny Plaintiff due process by terminating her case that calls for a trial under Rule 38?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion by relying on the erroneous legal premise that the Plaintiff is not part of the protected class of citizens
Docket Entries
2020-08-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED.
2020-07-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-05-27
Waiver of right of respondent GE Aviation to respond filed.
2020-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2020)
Attorneys
GE Aviation
Paul E. Prather — Littler Mendelson, PC, Respondent
LaLangie Hoskins
LaLangie Hoskins — Petitioner