Whether it is proper for lower courts to issue dismissal decisions by omitting essential facts and misconstruing factual allegations, and creating decisions not supported by the record. And do they have the authority to create a new pleading standard, and use criteria, and arguments that are contrary to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Supreme Court precedents, Federal Laws, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Guides and Manuals.

Whether it is proper for Appeal Courts to ignore a defendant's admission of committing a wrongdoing alleged. And whether frivolous motions to dismiss are proper instead of answering the complaint as FRCP Rule 12(b) requires.

Whether it is proper for decisions that are contrary to Federal authorities be unpublished and elude review. And whether such decisions commit or give the appearance of fraud upon the Court.

Whether lower courts can dismiss disability-related occupational injury civil complaints by omitting essential facts and misconstruing allegations, creating new pleading standards contrary to FRCP and Supreme Court precedents