IS PETITIONER ENTITLE OF THE TRIAL OF THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED CLAIM? BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS LONG BEEN A VICTIM OF THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED RESPONDENT AND SUBJECT TO THE ABOVE RESPONDENT'S THREAT WHILE PROCEEDING THE RELATED CLAIMS INVOLVING ABOVE IDENTIFIED RESPONDENT WHEN THE ABOVE RESPONDENT HAS DIRECTED A THREAT TOWARD PETITIONER "RESPONDENT IN THE RELATED CLAIM" AND IN NO UNCERTAIN TERM HAS VERIFIED THAT IF THE PETITIONER DOES NOT DROP PETITIONER'S ACTION INVOLVING RESPONDENT THEN PETITIONER WILL HAVE EASTERN BLOCKS TO DEAL WITH AND THAT WE KNOW HOW TO CREATE IT.

IS PETITIONER ENTITLE OF THE TRIAL OF THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED CLAIM BECAUSE LOWER COURTS DISMISSAL OF THE ABOVE CLAIM ON APRIL 12, 2016 APPENDIX B (APP 3) FOLLOWING PETITIONER'S DEPARTURE FROM THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA FOR MEDICAL LEAVE ON APRIL 9, 2016, DUE TO PETITIONER'S FAILING HEART, TO CLEVELAND CLINIC, OH, (APP 16) FOLLOWING FILING PETITIONER'S NOTICE OF MEDICAL LEAVE OF MARCH 24, 2017 FOR THREE (3) WEEKS (EXHIBIT B) HAS DEPRIVED PETITIONER FROM PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR APPEAL, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE ORDER OF APRIL 12, 2016, PURSUANT TO PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 903, RULE IS REPRINTED, THEREFORE, IT INVOLVES PROBLEMS WITH THE ISSUE OF CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE STATUTE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND WAS VIOLATION OF PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS (APP 8).

III. IS PETITIONER ENTITLE OF THE TRIAL OF THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED CLAIM BECAUSE LOWER COURT'S DISMISSAL OF THE ABOVE CLAIM ON APRIL 12, 2016, APPENDIX A (APP 2) IS VIOLATION OF PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS RIGHT AND BECAUSE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUPERVISES PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, FOR PROPER APPLICATION OF PENNSYLVANIA LAWS AND WITH THE ISSUE OF CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE STATUTES OF COMMONWEALTH, AS IT HAS BEEN DEFINED BY PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, BY ISSUING ITS ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 SEE APPENDIX A (APP 1) AND DISMISSING THE APPEAL OF THE ABOVE CLAIM (APPENDIX B) SETS THE RULE FOR ISSUING AN ORDER AND DISMISSING THE CLAIM WHILE PETITIONER IS IN MEDICAL LEAVE WHICH DEPRIVES THE PETITIONER FROM PETITIONER'S RIGHT FOR APPEAL THEREFORE IT CONTRADICTS WITH PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 903 WHICH ENTITLES THE PETITIONER WITH SUCH AN APPEAL (APP 8).

Whether petitioner is entitled to a trial on the identified claim due to threats from respondent, lower court's dismissal of the claim while petitioner was on medical leave depriving petitioner's right to appeal, and violation of petitioner's due process rights