| 19-183 |
Mark Douglas Robison v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-08-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
criminal-defense due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice prejudice-analysis sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-fairness trial-outcome |
In considering whether a criminal-defense attorney's deficient performance was prejudicial under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), is all… |
| 18-9695 |
Robert A. Wagner v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-06-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability due-process effective-representation expert-testimony eyewitness-identification habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance miller-el-standard miller-el-v-cockrell reasonable-probability trial-outcome |
Whether the Ninth Circuit's ruling denying a certificate of
appealability conflicts with the "debatable" standard from Miller-El u.
Cockrell, 537 U.S.… |
| 18-8921 |
Hector Tellez v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-04-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reasonable-time-period recent-precedence recent-precedent supremacy-clause supreme-court-precedent trial-counsel trial-outcome united-states-supreme-court |
WHAT IS A REASONABLE TIME PERIOD FOR TRIAL COUNSEL TO BE
REQUIRED TO BECOME AWARE OF RECENT PRECEDENCE,BEFORE HE/
SHE MAY DEEMED INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILI… |
| 18-5677 |
Robert Alan Loughner v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Virginia |
2018-08-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus habeas-corpus,ineffective-assistance-of-counsel,du ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-malpractice negligence prejudice trial-outcome trial-procedure |
Question not identified. |