| 22-6831 |
Will Lee Carter v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2023-02-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment freedom-of-religion self-incrimination sexually-violent-predator substantive-due-process |
This Court has ruled that a variation of mental commitment known in several states as a "sexually violent predator" commitment proceeding can be const… |
| 22-6496 |
Lonnie Kade Welsh v. Bryan Collier, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-01-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-commitment civil-rights criminal-acquittal due-process equal-protection involuntary-commitment mental-health psychological-disorder sexually-violent-predator treatment |
1. Does an individual who has been diagnosed with a state created psychological disorder have a right to treatment equal to those who the medical comm… |
| 21-6965 |
Lawtis Donald Rhoden v. Brandon Price, Executive Director of Coalinga State Hospital |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-01-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-commitment civil-rights dangerousness due-process fourteenth-amendment involuntary-commitment mental-disorder mental-health sexually-violent-predator state-hospitals unconditional-discharge |
I.
Whether The Current Version of the California SVP Law Violates the Due Process Clause under the Fourteenth Amendment because it does not offer a Me… |
| 20-7361 |
Robert Eugene Ayers v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2021-03-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-commitment civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment incorporation-doctrine jury-trial mental-health seventh-amendment sexual-predator sexually-violent-predator |
Was Petitioner entitled by the Incorporation of the Seventh Amendment's Jury Trial Clause into the Fourteenth Amendment to Trial By Jury in a State Ci… |
| 20-5624 |
Juan Francisco Vega v. Chad Poppell, Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-09-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
§2254-petition certificate-of-appealability circuit-court-discretion extraordinary-circumstances false-imprisonment habeas-corpus sexually-violent-predator successive-petitions |
WHETHER JURISTS OF REASON COULD DEBATE THAT THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY NOT GRANTING A COA
WHERE THE UNDERLYING CLAIM OF THE… |
| 19-7297 |
Christopher J. Burton v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Virginia |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-commitment collateral-consequences criminal-justice criminal-procedure deportation due-process professional-assistance sexually-violent-predator strickland-v-washington voluntary-plea |
1) IN THIS CASE OF FIRST IMPRESSION, I ASK THIS COURT TO FINALLY DECIDE WHETHER THE NATURE OF CIVIL COMMITMENT, ITS PROCEDURAL SIMILARITY TO DEPORTATI… |
| 19-6892 |
John R. Van Orden v. Mark Stringer, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-12-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-split civil-commitment due-process fundamental-rights liberty-interest mental-health-confinement sexually-violent-predator shocks-the-conscience substantive-due-process |
I. What is the proper analysis to review a substantive due process claim? Is it the conjunctive or disjunctive analysis?
II. Whether or not the Eight… |
| 19-5858 |
Lamarr T. Crittenden v. Keith Butts, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-09-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights constitutional-violation due-process ex-post-facto ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel retroactive-application sexual-violent-predator sexually-violent-predator |
Did The United States Court Of Appeals For The Seventh Circuit fail to address an issue of first impression involving an ex post facto violation of Th… |
| 18-7220 |
Pashtoon Farooqi v. California |
California |
2019-01-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
bill-of-attainder civil-commitment civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process hearsay-evidence jury-instruction mental-disorder sexually-violent-predator vagueness |
Does the California version of its Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA) violate the precedents of this Court, and is it therefore unconstitutional?
… |