patent-ineligibility
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-1554 | Worlds Inc. v. Activision Blizzard Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2022-06-10 | Denied | Response Waived | 35-usc-101 abstract-idea filtering patent-eligibility patent-ineligibility section-101 software-invention summary-judgment well-known-routine-conventional | In the mid-1990s, petitioner Worlds invented computer software with protocols that allowed an increased number of players to access a three-dimensiona… |
| 21-1370 | Spireon, Inc. v. Procon Analytics, LLC | Federal Circuit | 2022-04-21 | Denied | Relisted (2) | 35-usc-101 abstract-idea claim-construction fact-question federal-circuit judicial-exception patent-eligibility patent-ineligibility pleadings | 1. What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is "directed to" a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Court's tw… |
| 21-1228 | Ameranth, Inc. v. Olo, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2022-03-10 | Denied | 35-usc-101 alice-framework alice-two-step claim-construction judicial-exception patent-eligibility patent-ineligibility patent-ineligible-concept question-of-fact question-of-law section-101 | This computer-based patent infringement case presents the same questions pending before the Court in American Axle & Mfg, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC,… | |
| 20-891 | American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, et al. | Federal Circuit | 2021-01-05 | Denied | CVSGAmici (11)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) | 35-usc-101 alice-v-cls claim-construction judicial-exception judicial-exceptions patent-eligibility patent-ineligibility patent-law standard-of-review two-step-framework | American Axle invented a new process for making a new, useful, and tangible thing – a quieter automobile driveshaft. It is the type of invention that … |