| 21-8066 |
Christopher Darnell Wilson v. South Carolina, et al. |
South Carolina |
2022-06-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-error due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus judicial-bias multi-district-litigation res-judicata separation-of-powers subject-matter-jurisdiction |
(1) DO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS UNDER
FORTBEND COUNTY, TEXAS V. DAYIS , 139 S.Ct. 1843( U.S.2019) AND
HALL v. HALL, 138 S.Ct. 1118, 20… |
| 21-1218 |
Tyler Ayres, et al. v. Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal-mootness circuit-split class-action class-members final-judgment intervention-of-right MDL-proceeding mootness multi-district-litigation subject-matter-jurisdiction |
On remand from an appeal successfully challenging a proposed nationwide settlement, class counsel and his clients stopped representing the class membe… |
| 21-666 |
Parker Waichman, LLP, et al. v. Arnold Levin, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-11-04 |
Denied |
|
Alyeska-Pipeline-Serv.-Co.-v.-Wilderness-Soc'y attorney-fees Boeing-Co.-v.-Van-Gemert Common-benefit-doctrine common-fund-doctrine diversity-jurisdiction Equitable-common-fund-doctrine erie-doctrine Erie-R.-Co.-v.-Tompkins federal-equity-power Hensley-v.-Eckerhart multi-district-litigation |
The questions concern three subjects : (1) the authority of a court sitting in diversity jurisdiction to allocate contractual attorney fees from indiv… |
| 19-982 |
Erica Y. Bryant, et al. v. United States, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-02-05 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-transfer multi-district-litigation multidistrict-litigation preemption procedural-error state-law statute-of-repose |
1. Whether it is error, when considering a state statute of repose, for an MDL transferee court to ignore the decisions of the transferor court's stat… |
| 18-59 |
Eduardo Pineiro Perez, et al. v. BP, P.L.C., et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-07-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
class-action class-action-rule-23 district-court-dismissal docket-management federal-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure multi-district-litigation multi-plaintiff multi-plaintiff-lawsuits procedural-rights rule-23 shady-grove shady-grove-v-allstate supreme-court |
Based on a case management and administrative order, PTO 60, which permitted only single plaintiff lawsuits, the district court dismissed with prejudi… |