materiality-analysis

5 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
21-8085 Frank Jarvis Atwood v. Arizona Arizona 2022-06-08 Denied IFP brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence material-evidence material-exculpatory-evidence materiality-analysis prosecutorial-misconduct third-party-culpability 1. Did the State withhold material exculpatory evidence of a tip received by law enforcement independently linking a known third-party suspect to the …
21-6285 Gary Hughbanks v. Tim Shoop, Warden Sixth Circuit 2021-11-17 Denied IFP admissibility-of-evidence appellate-review brady-materiality brady-v-maryland confession-evidence criminal-procedure due-process materiality-analysis sixth-circuit suppressed-evidence Are another individual's repeated statements confessing to the murders for which the defendant is on trial material for purpose of assessing the impac…
21-5283 Richard Todd Haas v. United States Fourth Circuit 2021-08-03 Denied Response WaivedIFP fourth-amendment franks-hearing law-enforcement materiality materiality-analysis probable-cause recklessness search-and-seizure search-warrant Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in refusing to engage in a materiality analysis of the information omitted from the affidavits to determine whether t…
20-8237 Christopher Rad v. United States Third Circuit 2021-06-07 Denied Response WaivedIFP brady-v-maryland cumulative-effect giglio-v-united-states habeas-proceedings materiality-analysis napue-v-illinois (1) In federal habeas proceedings when violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963), Giglio v. United States,…
20-1608 North Carolina v. Norfolk Junior Best North Carolina 2021-05-18 Denied alternate-suspects appellate-review bloody-fingerprint brady-v-maryland brady-violation criminal-procedure due-process materiality materiality-analysis post-conviction post-conviction-review Does an appellate court violate the core princ ipals of Brady in post -conviction review where in its materiality analysis it disregards both evidence…