litigation-privilege
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-903 | Atturo Tire Corporation v. Toyo Tire Corp., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2025-02-21 | Denied | business-expectancy illinois-law litigation-privilege tortious-interference unfair-competition unjust-enrichment | Respondent Toyo, one of the world's largest tire companies, filed a complaint with the federal International Trade Commission ("ITC") against a group … | |
| 23-1375 | Anthony Italo Provitola v. Dennis L. Comer, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2024-07-02 | Denied | Response Waived | color-of-state-law constitutional-rights federal-jurisdiction litigation-privilege rooker-feldman-doctrine section-1983 | After Petitioner's State Action for declaratory judgment was corruptly terminated without any adjudication of the issues related to the declaration of… |
| 23-333 | Evan S. Gutman v. Citibank, N.A. | Florida | 2023-10-02 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-immunity litigation-privilege tortious-act | Does a State Supreme Court infringe upon the Due Process and Equal Protection Clause Rights of a Litigant in both the Civil and Criminal Context in ev… |
| 22-1141 | Gary Pisner v. Marla Rubinstein, et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2023-05-25 | Denied | civil-procedure cross-jurisdictional-preclusion defamation defamation-privilege documentary-evidence evidence forum-non-conveniens judicial-notice litigation-privilege procedural-requirements | 1. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201 and caselaw gives the parties the ability to enter documentary evidence through judicial notice; under what conditions can a… | |
| 18-6221 | Raymond P. Vinnie v. Bruce R. Henry, et al. | Massachusetts | 2018-10-04 | Denied | IFP | 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-42-usc-1983 constitutional-rights due-process fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court litigation-privilege standing state-immunity supremacy-clause | 1) Whether as a matter of first impression, are 5-private attorneys who fraudulently conspired with a Clerk of Court in a lawsuit for the sole purpose… |