hope-v-pelzer
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-1524 | Advantageous Community Services, LLC, et al. v. Gary King, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2021-05-03 | Denied | civil-procedure civil-rights due-process hope-v-pelzer legal-immunity medicaid-fraud qualified-immunity state-employees | 1. Should the doctrine of qualified immunity be limited to defenses at common law when the Civil Rights Act was adopted or should it be abolished by t… | |
| 20-744 | Michael Wigginton, Jr. v. The University of Mississippi, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2020-11-30 | Denied | Response Waived | 42-usc-1983 circuit-split civil-rights clearly-established-right due-process fifth-circuit hope-v-pelzer qualified-immunity state-actors supreme-court-precedent | Whether the Fifth Circuit's grant of qualified immunity to the state actors named in the instant matter was violative of Supreme Court precedent estab… |
| 20-353 | J. H., By Conservator, Betty Harris v. Williamson County, Tennessee, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2020-09-16 | Denied | civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fair-warning hope-v-pelzer qualified-immunity reasonable-standard state-actor | 1. Is Hope v. Pelzer dead in the Court's analysis of qualified immunity? If Hope v. Pelzer is dead, the lower courts, the federal court bar, and the l… | |
| 19-1466 | Tammy Korthals v. Bradley Strozeski | Sixth Circuit | 2020-07-07 | Denied | Response Waived | 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights due-process hope-v-pelzer non-decisional-evidence police police-liability qualified-immunity standing | Whether non-decisional evidence must be considered when determining the protections of qualified immunity for a police officer as originally held in H… |
| 19-8613 | Abdul Shabazz Wiggins v. Virginia | Virginia | 2020-06-05 | Denied | IFP | anderson-v-creighton civil-rights due-process graham-v-connor hope-v-pelzer hudson-v-mcmillian qualified-immunity strickland-v-washington supreme-court-precedent use-of-force | 1. Whether the General District and Circuit Courts of Suffolk ignored the defendant's right to Qualified Immunity as set forth in Hudson v. McMillian … |