| 23-7722 |
Christopher Harry West v. Brian Emig, Warden |
Delaware |
2024-06-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-violation carter-v-illinois constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process harrington-v-richter post-conviction post-conviction-review second-challenges state-law-procedural-requirement suppression-requirement |
J<bo/eJ Wk<2r€ SUta £ouf4 poJ-f-cqAv/ic-fi '
v/<VV\^u+ <* kzy S4<t-fe- pro<-^Jor<\] r^^uirQmznf <vjJ 4/,e S-/a4u>fe
vl<x$ fnow^fVH/ c tank'd vifh no… |
| 20-6876 |
Leon Tollette v. Benjamin Ford, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-01-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254(d) eleventh-circuit federal-habeas-review harrington-v-richter ineffective-assistance-of-counsel statutory-interpretation wilson-v-sellers |
Whether, on federal habeas review under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), a federal court may refuse to "look through" to the last reasoned state court decision, a… |
| 20-5174 |
Ronald Demetrius Thomas v. William Muniz, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-07-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254 constitutional-rights federal-courts habeas-corpus harrington-v-richter ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reasonable-application state-court-review |
1. In applying Harrington Vs. Richter, 562 U.S. 86((2011), on the state's unreasonable application of Constitutional effective assistance of counsel i… |
| 18-1273 |
Alma Caldavado v. New York |
New York |
2019-04-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-rights criminal-defense expert-testimony harrington-v-richter ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-evidence presumption-of-ineffective-assistance shaken-baby-syndrome strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
1. In an SBS prosecution, where defense counsel neither calls, nor consults with, an SBS expert to counter the prosecution's expert testimony on the "… |
| 18-6753 |
Jesse Mendez v. Gary Swarthout, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254 28-usc-2255 district-court federal-review habeas-corpus habeas-petition harrington-v-richter judicial-deference reasoned-decision state-appellate-court state-court state-court-decision statutory-interpretation |
When a state court denied a habeas claim without a reasoned decision, in assessing whether "there was no reasonable basis for the state court to deny … |
| 18-6762 |
Edward Louis Thomas v. Texas |
Texas |
2018-11-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure cumulative-error due-process habeas-corpus harrington-v-richter hinton-v-alabama ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice standard-of-review strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
DID THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLY THE WRONG STANDARD OF REVIEW IN ANALYZING THE CLAIM OF DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE BY TRIAL COUNSEL?
DID THE … |