| 23A364 |
BP America Production Company, et al. v. Parish of Cameron, Louisiana, et al. |
Louisiana |
2023-10-24 |
Denied |
|
coastal-erosion environmental-liability federal-preemption land-use oil-and-gas state-law |
Question not identified. |
| 22-465 |
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, et al. v. International Paper Company, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-11-16 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (1)Relisted (2) |
cercla cercla-statute-of-limitations contribution contribution-action damages declaratory-judgment environmental-liability judicial-interpretation response-costs statute-of-limitations |
CERCLA's three-year statute of limitations for an "action for contribution for any response costs or damages" under § 113(f) begins running on "the da… |
| 22-126 |
Gould Electronics, Inc. v. Livingston County Road Commission |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-08-09 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
cercla cost-recovery environmental-liability expert-witness expert-witness-fees lobbying necessary-costs-of-response recovery regulatory-determination remedial-action tce-contamination |
1. Are fees paid to an expert witness "necessary costs of response" that can be recovered under Section 107(a) of CERCLA?
2. Are fees paid to a consu… |
| 20-1142 |
Atlantic Richfield Company v. Asarco LLC |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-02-22 |
Dismissed |
Response RequestedResponse Waived |
bankruptcy cercla contribution contribution-claim environmental-liability judicial-settlement liability response-action settlement statutory-interpretation |
Whether a judicially approved settlement that conclusively determines a party's obligation to perform response actions "resolves its liability" for "s… |
| 20-382 |
Territory of Guam v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2020-09-24 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (3) |
cercla clean-water-act comprehensive-environmental-response-compensation- consent-decree contribution contribution-claim environmental-law environmental-liability judicial-settlement statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether a non-CERCLA settlement can trigger a contribution claim under CERCLA Section 113(f)(3)(B).
2. Whether a settlement that expressly disclai… |
| 18-1160 |
Teck Metals Ltd., fka Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. v. The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-06 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
arranger-liability cercla cercla-arranger-liability cross-border-pollution environmental-liability extraterritorial-application first-circuit-conflict first-circuit-split morrison-v-national-australia-bank personal-jurisdiction rjr-nabisco-v-european-community walden-v-fiore waste-disposal |
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit, in conflict with Morrison v.National Australia Bank Ltd. , 561 U.S. 247
(2010), and RJR Nabisco, Inc. v.European Communi… |