| 25-6201 |
Frank Paul Ferrara v. Virginia, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-11-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
attorney-general civil-commitment constitutional-law discretionary-action equal-protection fourteenth-amendment |
Question No. 1: Whether the Commonwealth of Virginia violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection of the laws when the Attorney G… |
| 24A337 |
Ayton Sanchez Romero v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-10-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
discretionary-action due-process immigration judicial-review nationality-act removal |
Question not identified. |
| 19-217 |
DaVinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-08-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bivens-claim bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents civil-asset-forfeiture civil-asset-forfeiture-reform-act civil-rights discretionary-action espionage-act federal-tort-claims-act fourth-amendment subject-matter-jurisdiction |
1. Does the exception for forfeitures created by the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA), Pub. L. No. 106-185, § 3, 114 Stat. 202 for pr… |
| 18-1435 |
Matthew Wayne Minard, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Taylor Police Officer v. Debra Lee Cruise-Gulyas |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-05-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-rights discretion discretionary-action discretionary-enforcement due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment free-speech law-enforcement qualified-immunity retaliation retaliatory-arrest traffic-stop |
I. Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals define the "clearly established" constitutional rights at issue in this qualified immunity case at too high … |
| 18-765 |
James H. Brady v. New York, et al. |
New York |
2018-12-17 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights discretionary-action due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment immunity legal-fees obstruction-of-justice property-rights prosecutorial-immunity prosecutorial-misconduct quid-pro-quo sanctions standing takings |
As the New York State Attorney General and Manhattan District Attorney were not acting as advocates for the people when they permitted Petitioner's co… |