diligence-standard
6 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-7397 | John Fitzgerald Hanson v. Oklahoma | Oklahoma | 2025-06-11 | Denied | IFP | brady-violation capital-murder diligence-standard evidence-suppression prosecutorial-misconduct witness-testimony | 1) Whether a court may impose a diligence standard rendering any evidence that can be obtained from witnesses per se available via the exercise of rea… |
| 20-6193 | Martin L. Harrell v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2020-11-02 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-procedure diligence-standard due-process habeas-corpus material-fact mcquiggin mcquiggin-standard new-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct summary-denial | Whether Evidence Not Presented as the Result of Prosecutorial Misconduct Should Be Considered New Evidence under McQuiggin? Whether a District Court … |
| 20-5668 | Kelly Frithiof Sundberg v. Harold Oreol, Executive Director of Patton State Hospital | Ninth Circuit | 2020-09-11 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-split civil-procedure diligence-standard due-process equitable-tolling federal-procedure habeas-corpus section-2254 standing | Along with the Fifth and Eighth Circuits, the Ninth Circuit requires petitioners that qualify for equitable tolling to show diligence during the perio… |
| 18-7661 | Philip Walter Jones v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | Eleventh Circuit | 2019-01-30 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-courts circuit-split diligence diligence-standard judicial-procedure new-evidence pace-v-diguglielmo postconviction-motion proper-filing properly-filed relief-standard time-bar untimely | This case presents two questions pertaining to the "proper filing" requirement that were left open by Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408 (2005) and tha… |
| 18-776 | Pedro Pablo Guerrero-Lasprilla v. William P. Barr, Attorney General | Fifth Circuit | 2018-12-19 | Judgment Issued | Amici (1)Relisted (2) | agency-decision criminal-alien-bar diligence-standard due-process equitable-tolling immigration-law judicial-review removability statutory-deadline statutory-interpretation | 1. Whether the application of a legal standard to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law, or a pure question of fact that may be barred from … |
| 18-5763 | Jimmy Don Wooten v. Arkansas | Arkansas | 2018-08-24 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights diligence-standard due-process insanity insanity-defense jurisdiction legal-diligence mental-capacity mental-handicap procedural-fairness standing | I. DID THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT VIOLATE DUE PROCESS BY DENYING MENTALLY HANDICAPPED PETITIONER OPPORTUNITY TO LITIGATE INSANITY AT TIME OF TRIAL? I… |