chapman-standard
8 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-5440 | Roman Andreyevich Glukhoy v. California | California | 2023-08-25 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-review chapman-standard chapman-v-california criminal-procedure harmless-error jury-instructions legal-theory prejudice prejudicial-error standard-of-review | 1. When a defendant is convicted after a trial court instructs a jury on two theories of guilt, one of which is legally correct and one legally incorr… |
| 21-5318 | Beatrice Munyenyezi v. United States | First Circuit | 2021-08-06 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 28-usc-2255 brecht-standard chapman-standard federal-procedure habeas-corpus harmless-error jury-instruction post-conviction-relief supreme-court-review | When reviewing a habeas corpus claim under 28 U.S.C. §2255, where the court is considering for the first time whether an erroneous jury instruction on… |
| 20-826 | Mike Brown, Acting Warden v. Ervine Davenport | Sixth Circuit | 2020-12-18 | Judgment Issued | Amici (3)Relisted (2) | 28-usc-2254(d)(1) brecht-test chapman-standard chapman-test constitutional-error federal-habeas-court federal-review habeas-corpus habeas-review state-court-adjudication | In Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993), the Court held that the test for determining whether a constitutional error was harmless on habeas revie… |
| 19-7208 | Gbenga Benson Ogundele v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2020-01-08 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | chapman-standard confrontation-clause due-process evidence fair-trial federal-rule-of-evidence federal-rules-of-evidence government-evidence sixth-amendment | Whether voluminous amounts of substantive evidence containing prejudicial opinions of government agents held to be erroneously admitted under Federal … |
| 19-642 | Shawntele Cortez Jackson v. Kathy Litteral | Sixth Circuit | 2019-11-19 | Denied | Response Waived | brecht-standard chapman-standard esparza-standard habeas-corpus habeas-review harmless-error self-defense sixth-circuit | 1. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in applying the Esparza harmless error standard, instead of the Brecht harmless error standard on federal habeas re… |
| 19-5232 | Ricky Ray Malone v. Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden | Tenth Circuit | 2019-07-18 | Denied | IFP | chapman-standard chapman-v-california constitutional-violation criminal-procedure cumulative-error cumulative-error-analysis federal-law harmless-error harmlessness-review plain-error plain-error-review prejudice prejudice-component | 1. Where plain error review includes a built-in prejudice component, is subjecting an acknowledged plain error to a second round of harmlessness revie… |
| 18-9382 | Joshua Wofford v. United States | Tenth Circuit | 2019-05-22 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-review chapman-standard chapman-v-california constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-construction harmless-error prosecutorial-evidence standard-of-review | Whether the federal court of appeals, while determining whether potential constitutional error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt pursuant to the … |
| 18-298 | Michael Vernon Beaty, Jr. v. South Carolina | South Carolina | 2018-09-07 | Denied | Response Waived | chapman-standard chapman-v-california constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process due-process,criminal-procedure,constitutional-law, due-process,criminal-procedure,harmless-error,chap harmless-error judicial-review right-to-respond standard-of-review supreme-court-standard | I. Does the South Carolina Supreme Court's standard for determining harmless constitutional error depart from this Court's mandates in Chapman v. Ca… |