28-usc-2254(d)(2)

2 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
23-7169 Robert G. Pulley v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al. Ninth Circuit 2024-04-10 Denied IFP 28-usc-2254(d)(2) aedpa-statute-of-limitations california-penal-code-section-198.5 habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel preliminary-hearing-testimony schlup-actual-innocence-exception state-procedural-default unreasonable-determination-of-fact unreasonable-determination-of-law 1. WHAT CONSTITUTES SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO OVERCOME THE PRESUMPTION CREATED BY THE CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 198.5, WHERE THE STATE COURT'S DECISI…
18-9676 Randy Ethan Halprin v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division Fifth Circuit 2019-06-14 Denied IFP 28-usc-2254(d)(2) aedpa aedpa-deference capital-punishment-eligibility certificate-of-appealability enmund-v-florida habeas-corpus lockett-v-ohio merits-review procedural-default tison-v-arizona In light of these decisions, the Fifth Circuit's denial of Randy Halprin's motion for a COA gives rise to the following questions: 1. Has the Fifth C…