28-usc-1447c
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-894 | Gregory O. Garmong v. Maupin, Cox & Legoy | Ninth Circuit | 2024-02-21 | Denied | 28-usc-1447c bankruptcy-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure federal-procedure martin-v-franklin-capital-corp remand-fees removal removal-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation | The petitioner brought a breach of contract action in Nevada state court against the law firm which represented him in a bankruptcy filed by his ex-wi… | |
| 22-955 | Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. City of Seattle, Washington | Ninth Circuit | 2023-03-30 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | 28-usc-1447c article-iii article-three-limits federal-courts futility-doctrine jurisdiction remand removal removal-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction | 1. Is the court-created "futility" doctrine, which allows a United States court to decide a case removed from state court even though it lacks jurisdi… |
| 20-6749 | Ricardo Morales v. Missouri, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2020-12-31 | Denied | IFP | 28-usc-1447c civil-procedure civil-procedure-violation conflict-of-interest due-process equal-protection federal-removal judicial-misconduct | I. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT WAS CLEARLY ERRONEOUS AND DENIED PETITIONER FEDERAL DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECT… |