| 25-6938 |
Anthony Tyrone Campbell, Sr. v. P. Dickey, former Corrections Officer |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-03-02 |
Pending |
IFP |
28-USC-636 appellate-review consent-requirement federal-procedure filing-fees magistrate-judge-jurisdiction |
1. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit consequently
overlook Federal Law pertaining to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), where, petitio… |
| 23-6140 |
In Re Yi Tai Shao |
|
2023-11-30 |
Pending |
IFP |
28-usc-636 civil-procedure due-process first-amendment judicial-conspiracy judicial-disqualification judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction magistrate-judge venue-change |
Whether the District Court's dismissal order must be reversed and remanded to a neutral District Court when it is undisputed and no appellees objected… |
| 20-5746 |
Brandon Thomas Finnesy v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-09-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-636 consent-jurisdiction criminal-procedure federal-courts federal-criminal-procedure guilty-plea judicial-consent magistrate-judge statutory-interpretation |
Whether 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) authorizes a federal magistrate judge to accept a guilty plea with the parties' consent? |
| 19-8262 |
Miguel Algarin v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-04-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-636 appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure equitable-exceptions federal-statute judicial-review magistrate magistrate-review objection-standard procedural-waiver waiver |
Whether a party's failure to object to a magistrate's ruling under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) creates a jurisdictional bar to appellate review, or merel… |
| 18-1547 |
Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. v. Shawn Jensen, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-06-14 |
Denied |
|
28-usc-636 civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-litigation constitutional-violation federal-court-procedure federal-jurisdiction federal-rights magistrate-judge magistrate-judge-selection magistrate-jurisdiction prison-litigation-reform-act prospective-relief statutory-interpretation |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit—in direct conflict with
the Seventh Circuit—erroneously fail to recognize that
28 U.S.C. § 636(c) precludes the parties from … |
| 18-8229 |
Sam Chinn, aka Sam Chinn, III v. Joseph Noeth, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility |
Second Circuit |
2019-03-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-455 28-usc-636 article-iii article-iii-section-2 article-iii-violation civil-procedure constitutional-claims due-process federal-rule-8 habeas-corpus judicial-disqualification magistrate-judge-process plea-bargaining prosecutorial-misconduct rule-60b-motion |
WHETHER THE DENIAL OF A RULE 60(b) MOTION, BY THE DISTRICT COURT, AND THE DENIAL OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BY THE COURT OF APPEALS, WAS A ABUS… |
| 18-834 |
Farzana Sheikh, et vir v. San Joaquin General Hospital |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-03 |
Denied |
|
28-usc-636 article-iii article-iii-standing civil-procedure civil-rights due-process injunctive-relief judicial-procedure magistrate magistrate-referral standing |
A federal court's "obligation" to hear and decide a case that implicates Constitutional and Civil Rights is "virtually unflagging". Parallel state-cou… |