| 21-6364 |
Kenneth R. Friend v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-2518 authorization-defect dahda-v-united-states deputy-assistant-attorney-general deputy-attorney-general fourth-amendment good-faith-exception warrant-requirement wiretap-statute |
Does the good faith exception to the warrant requirement established in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), apply to warrants issued in violat… |
| 18-9700 |
Daniel Gatson v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2019-06-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2518 aggrieved-person cell-phone-records criminal-procedure Does the District Court have the authority to sent electronic-interception electronic-surveillance expert-testimony expert-testimony-federal-rule-of-evidence-702-scie fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-cell-phone-records-probable-cause sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-upward-departure-district-co standing standing-aggrieved-person-electronic-interception- Whether acquiring a person's past movements throug Whether an expert's testimony that has never been |
I. Whether the "target " of an electronic interception, whom voice was heard in intercepted conversations have "standing " as an "aggrieved person " u… |
| 18-6951 |
Jamal Cooper v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-12-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2518 4th-amendment congressional-intent consent-requirements criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment franks-v-delaware necessity-requirement omnibus-crime-control-act probable-cause separate-application statutory-interpretation wiretap-application wiretap-necessity wiretap-statute |
Is 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (1)c) a statutory provision that reflects Congress' core concerns and does § 2518 (1)(c) require that each request for a wiretap b… |
| 18-6681 |
Mark Anthony Rios, et al. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2518 electronic-surveillance federal-surveillance federalism investigative-procedures necessity necessity-requirement privacy state-wiretaps title-iii wiretap-necessity wiretapping-surveillance |
Is the availability of less-intrusive state wiretaps a material consideration for federal judges when evaluating Title III necessity under 18 U.S.C. §… |
| 18-5759 |
Daniela Castellanos v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-08-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2518 electronic-surveillance fourth-amendment illinois-v-gates investigative-procedures officer-conclusions-opinions privacy privacy-invasion probable-cause wiretap-warrant wiretapping wiretapping-procedures-18-usc-2518 |
1. Whether the facts required to establish probable cause, Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S., 238, 103 S. Ct. 2317 (1983), include conclusions and opinions … |