No. 25A565
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. v. Narguess Noohi, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure class-certification expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence rule-702
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the case is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal district courts must apply the full rigor of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 at the class certification stage, or may conduct a more limited evidentiary analysis
Docket Entries
2025-11-14
Application (25A565) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 16, 2026.
2025-11-12
Application (25A565) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 2, 2025 to January 16, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Hannah Y. S. Chanoine — O'Melveny and Myers LLP, Petitioner