No. 25-857
Joshua Yarbrough, et al. v. SlashSupport, Incorporated, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: circumstantial-evidence civil-rights employment-discrimination judicial-doctrine stray-remarks summary-judgment
Latest Conference:
2026-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether discriminatory remarks categorized as stray under a judicial doctrine may be excluded from the mix of circumstantial evidence of discrimination.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether discriminatory remarks categorized as stray under a judicial doctrine may be excluded from the mix of circumstantial evidence of discrimination
Docket Entries
2026-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
2026-01-23
Waiver of Glow Networks, Inc. of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Glow Networks, Inc. to respond filed.
2026-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2026)
Attorneys
Glow Networks, Inc.
Charles Thomas Frazier Jr. — Alexander Dubose & Jefferson LLP, Respondent
Joshua Yarbrough; Matt Lofland; Lee Green; Sterling Vicks; Joshua Walker; Michael Brown; Adawale Ashiru; Paul Tijani; Peter Tijani; Brandon Price; Harom Pringle; Osasu William Aigheyisi; Brett Samuels; and Rukevwe Ologban
Brian P. Sanford — The Sanford Firm, Petitioner