(A) Whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, Sec. 8, allow Federal Government Employees to equal protection as federal employees and should the Federal Government be held accountable for the wrongful termination of Roberta Lee.

(B) Whether all of the abuse of discretion and fraud upon the court by and in the Merit System Protection Board Appeal and the Appeals Court of the Federal Circuit Court violated the petitioner's U.S. Constitutional rights of the First, Fifth, Seventh, Eleventh and Fourteenth intentionally to harm the case and should these infractions vitiate all appeal court of the Federal Circuit Court orders and restore the petitioner to make her whole again.

Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should address questions of law that will assist in future areas of law for the public that are Equal Employment Opportunity covered under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

(1) Whether the respondents and court of appeals Federal Circuit Judges intentionally violated the petitioners U.S. Constitutional rights aforementioned in (A) and when the respondents filed a Formal EEO Complaint the MSPB Judge and the Court of Appeals overlooked that the termination was a Reprisal because the Petitioner reported in June 2017 that she was being subjected to harassment, hostile work environment and discrimination. The Court of Appeals and the MSPB Judge overlooked the fact that I, Roberta Lee, Petitioner was assaulted by her second level supervisor and asked for a witness to attend the meeting with me because the same person that the Agency wanted her to go into a secluded area with had been removed from being her supervisor because of a previous EEO Mediation Agreement.

Whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the First Amendment allow federal employees equal protection and accountability for wrongful termination