1. Whether a complaint in an employment discrimination lawsuit must contain specific facts that establish a prima facie case of discrimination?

2. Whether comparator evidence can support an inference of discrimination if the plaintiff and comparators do not share the same position, duties, and supervisor.

3. Whether a jury's disbelief of an employer's proffered reason for an adverse employment action can sustain an inference of discrimination or retaliation.

4. Whether, this Supreme Court of the United States reverses the decision of the District Court of Puerto Rico and the First Circuit, regarding the filing of a motion to dismiss by the defendants (pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the F.R.Ciy.P.), and if the Court denies the motion to dismiss, the defendants must respond to the amended complaint of this plaintiff with clear, legal and constitutional arguments;

Whether a complaint in an employment discrimination lawsuit must contain specific facts that establish a prima facie case of discrimination; whether comparator evidence can support an inference of discrimination if the plaintiff and comparators do not share the same position, duties, and supervisor; whether a jury's disbelief of an employer's proffered reason for an adverse employment action can sustain an inference of discrimination or retaliation