1. Can facts be removed from a summary motion under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?

2. Did the three judges of the instant case and the three judges of Qiu v. Anderson, 23-5888 form unequal protection of laws against the Constitution? Did they violate the Rule of Law?

3. Is the standard McDonnell Douglas framework still applicable when an employer selects one of the two unqualified applicants?

4. Should the applicants' qualifications be determined by the description of the job in the job posting?

5. Did the courts violate Qiu's Constitutional right to Due Process and equal protection of laws under Amendment XIV? Did the courts violate the Rule of Law?

Whether the district court and circuit court improperly applied summary judgment standards and violated constitutional due process rights in a Title VII employment discrimination case involving a qualified Asian-American physics teacher