1. Did the Pandemic (Covid-19 Federally Mandated Shutdowns/Lockdowns) present a considerable factor in the Equitable Tolling of Time, Reasonable Diligence and the Inaccessibility of the Clerk's Office (as defined in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(A)(3)) regarding TIMELY FILING judicial documents during the year 2020?

2. Does the Respondent's (Methodist Health Systems) Motion to Dismiss based on failure to state a claim in a timely manner (180th day limit, with documents acknowledged by EEOC on 181st day) SUPERCEDE the "Right to Sue" granted by the EEOC for the particular claim?

3. Does suspected Judicial Misconduct or Failure to Address Facts/Motions constitute a justification for a new trial in a different venue?

4. Was the Magistrate's decision to Dismiss with PREJUDICE the appropriate and justified ruling by the US District Court of Northern Texas?

5. Does a Right to Sue issued by a federal agency grant a petitioner of the court an actual actionable right to sue in this case?

Whether the COVID-19 pandemic and federal lockdowns constitute a valid basis for equitable tolling of filing deadlines in a pro se employment discrimination case