No. 24-6919

Pablo Enrique Rosado Sanchez v. Travis Kalanick, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2025-04-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: algorithmic-harassment employment-discrimination independent-contractor-rights non-disclosure-agreement tip-stealing uber-ai-manipulation
Latest Conference: 2025-05-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Why 3 Judges enforced their opinion and Mandate, but paid no attention, to the Document filed 2 days before: "The Uber's Tip Steal Scheme and Against the Law Harassment Policy Enforcement Cycle" By imposing me technical protocols, allowing Uber: - Steal tips massively to their own Drivers; - Harass us, and even fire us with no reason; By means of Generative Artificial Intelligence, which none of them knows anything about; Because there is no clear precedent about it in any U.S. Federal Court: Forcing me to go out of Court: - Requiring me Silence, called non-disclosure; - With the lawyers representing Uber, That was allowed by the Court to get away In spite of Their unlawful practices?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Uber's use of generative artificial intelligence to manipulate driver earnings and employment status constitutes an unlawful labor practice that violates independent contractor rights

Docket Entries

2025-05-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2025-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent Travis Kalanick, et al. to respond filed.
2025-03-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 5, 2025)

Attorneys

Pablo Enrique Rosado Sanchez
Pablo Enrique Rosado Sanchez — Petitioner
Travis Kalanick, et al.
Lady E. CumpianoSchuster, LLC, Respondent