An important federal question of National Importance of whether The United States COURT OF APPEALS (COA) for the Federal Circuit. VIOLATED The Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act (WPA/WPEA) under U.S.C Chapter 23, and U.S.C. 1221; when the COURT OF APPEALS (COA) had AUTHORITY and JURISDICTION to ADDRESS & CORRECT an Issue and claim of a 714 FIRED Whistleblower in consolidated cases #22-1844, #23-1311, #23-1204, of the UNLAWFUL Prohibited Personnel Practice (PPP) Adverse Action after the COA found the AIB Investigation retaliatory and the Third Retaliatory Reassignment Ms. Doyle was fired from, on Sept. 20. 2018.

I look to the U.S. Supreme Court on this IMPORTANT federal question under The Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act. (WPA/WPEA) and BEST INTEREST of the PUBLIC EYE, to address the CONFLICTING and INCONSISTENT, Narrow Review Dismissed Decision against a FIRED WHISTLEBLOWER, who was NOT PROTECTED in the found to be Retaliatory THIRD REASSIGNMNET. In the eye of the Public, they only see the Whistleblower being held Accountable.

Whether The COA Violated the Law & Discretion under The Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act. (WPA/WPEA) to NOT Review or address, Ms. Doyle 's statement claims in 22-1844 of her filing appeal case #19-1786. when Ms. Doyle used the WORD "DISCRIMINATE " to describe the Retaliatory "FIRED ADVERSE ACTION " from #PH-0714-18-0484-I-l.

Whether the COA Violated & Failed, its Authority of Judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(l)(A)(b), 5 U.S.C.1201. and THE WPA/WPEA ACT, to address, answer, and hold Accountability the multiple un-ethical, illegal, intentional & deliberate actions from a Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Syska, against a KNOWN Whistleblower. Presented to the COA in Case #23-1204: Doc.#26, Ms. Doyle made Non-Frivolous allegations & presented abundance of evidence of contradictions of LAW, from ALJ Syska whom DECONSOT JDATED and REMOVED, the Prohibited Personnel Practice (PPP1 "FIRED " ADVERSE ACTION out of Ms. Dovle 's current docketed HIGH MERIT Whistleblower

Whether the COA Violates the WPA/WPEA law, in a decision statement that contradicts the claims & evidence, ignoring claims and evidence to the Retaliatory Animus and Actions, to the Ultimate Goal of Denis Sullivan 's planned Agenda for an Instant Termination of a Whistleblower by forcing Ms. Doyle into the AMSA position.

Whether The United States COURT OF APPEALS violated the law, ignored, denied & failed to properly address and answer Ms. Doyle 's VALID claims under title 5 U.S.C. 2302(b¥8)(a)(2)(i)(ii): "Failure To Promote " and "Denied an Appointment " due

Whether the Court of Appeals violated the Whistleblower Protection Enforcement Act by improperly dismissing a whistleblower's claims of retaliation and adverse employment actions