No. 24-5511
Jane Doe v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
IFP
Tags: contract-law deliberate-indifference federal-funding pro-se-representation sexual-harassment title-ix
Latest Conference:
2024-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Q1: Does it amount to deliberate indifference under Title IX when a recipient (a) fraudulently tailor sexual assault case outcome to secure federal funding; (b) fail to protect students' privacy and respond to the subsequent retaliation complaint?
Q.2: Whether lower courts deprived pro se petitioner's 28 U.S. Code § 1654 rights to represent herself in federal court when they denied her an opportunity to be heard in favor of represented party?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does fraudulent tailoring of sexual assault case outcomes and failure to protect student privacy constitute deliberate indifference under Title IX?
Docket Entries
2024-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2024)