No. 24-5491
Phile Andra Watson v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-04-25
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Title VII's retaliation provision and similarly worded statutes require a plaintiff to prove but-for causation (i.e., that an employer would not have taken an adverse employment action but for an improper motive), or instead require only proof that the employer had a mixed motive (i.e., that an improper motive was one of multiple reasons for the employment action).
2. Whether the statutory phase discrimination based on age includes retaliation based on the filing of age discrimination complaint
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Title VII's retaliation provision requires but-for causation or mixed-motive standard for proving employment discrimination
Docket Entries
2025-04-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2024-11-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General to respond filed.
2024-04-24
Application (23A932) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until May 31, 2024.
2024-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2024)
2024-04-12
Application (23A932) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 16, 2024 to May 31, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Phile Watson
Phile Watson — Petitioner