No. 24-289

Yolanda D. Tyson v. Town of Ramapo, New York, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: americans-with-disabilities-act comparator-analysis employment-discrimination mcdonnell-douglas-test prima-facie-case racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess Patent EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2024-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

May an employer dispute plaintiff's prima facie case of racial discrimination by disputing the similarly situated status of comparators on a ground made unlawful by the Americans with Disabilities Act?

Must a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason adduced to justify an adverse employment action be lawful or may, as here, defendants provide an unlawful basis for the disparate treatment of Petitioner as a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its action and still prevail?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

May an employer dispute a plaintiff's prima facie case of racial discrimination by using a comparator status determination that violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, and may an employer provide an unlawful basis as a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for adverse employment action?

Docket Entries

2024-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-10-08
Waiver of right of respondent Town of Ramapo, New York, et al. to respond filed.
2024-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2024)

Attorneys

Town of Ramapo, New York, et al.
Leo DorfmanSokoloff Stern, LLP, Respondent
Yolanda Tyson
Stephen BergsteinBergstein & Ullrich, Petitioner