No. 24-260
Anthony Pandrella v. United States
Response Waived
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the robbery of a loanshark could have an effect on interstate commerce sufficient to establish federal jurisdiction under the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) even where the victim had withdrawn from the loansharking business prior to the robbery?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a robbery of a former loanshark victim can establish federal jurisdiction under the Hobbs Act when the victim had previously withdrawn from the loansharking business
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2024)
2024-06-18
Application (23A1122) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 5, 2024.
2024-06-13
Application (23A1122) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 7, 2024 to September 5, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Anthony Pandrella
Marshall Aron Mintz — Mintz Law PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent