No. 24-179
Eric Katz v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-procedure eeoc-complaint employment-discrimination material-fact reasonable-accommodation rehabilitation-act
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the court erred in upholding the
ruling that there was no genuine issue of material
fact with regard to Mr. Katz 's claim that the DOJ
violated the reasonable accommodation requirement
of the Rehabilitation Act?
2. Whether the court erred in upholding the
ruling that there was no genuine issue of material
fact with regard to Mr. Katz 's claim that the DOJ
retaliated against Mr. Katz after he made
complaints to the EEOC and the DOJ OIG?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in upholding the ruling that there was no genuine issue of material fact with regard to Mr. Katz's claims of DOJ violations of the Rehabilitation Act and potential retaliation?
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General to respond filed.
2024-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2024)
Attorneys
Eric Katz
Eric Katz — Petitioner
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent