No. 24-10

Marecia Bell v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-2000e-16 employment-law federal-employment pay-discrimination protected-class summary-judgment title-vii title-vii-discrimination
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA CriminalProcedure Securities EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether a failure to follow federal rules relating to pay without credible explanation that results in a protected class receiving less pay than other protected classes for the same duties and responsibilities can be enough to create a genuine issue of material fact preventing summary judgment in a Title VII claim under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a).

2. Whether Tolan v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650 (2014), is applicable to federal employee Title VII claims.

Subsidiary questions are whether the language and syntax of Title VII should be interpreted as it was under the ADEA, and whether such language bans retaliation in federal employment.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a failure to follow federal rules relating to pay without credible explanation that results in a protected class receiving less pay than other protected classes for the same duties and responsibilities can be enough to create a genuine issue of material fact preventing summary judgment in a Title VII claim under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a)

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-11
Waiver of Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary to respond filed.
2024-07-03

Attorneys

Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Marecia Bell
Joseph D MagriMerkle, Magri, Meythaler, PA, Petitioner