No. 23-7008

Lawrence Martin v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment brady-violation civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence federal-court new-trial relief trial-rights
Latest Conference: 2024-04-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

Federal Question / Did THE Supreme Court of THE UNITED STATES MAIL MARTIN PROBS IN FV\S I / fi / 2.6 22. , AaJSO U /\l/Z07Z LE6AC ivuv-lt^ , \M<Vs MMCTlhl £w nne D "TO £uL€ R PRoDQCTloN Of DO CllVxAfcrJTf* .1.

DiD A £>RADY viol Anri o M tcc\J £. wv+en -FaV oeA-e>lE wurecAL Evi06/^CE vOAs VfJiT'rt vt£ LD / DISCARDED.

WAS H M2.TI >i inTiTLtO Tt> A MEvJ TLiaL I si -FCOEKAC COURT FdR BRA pY \ZlDLATi o «,4-.

f^E C AU^t Op BRMW \ii OlA Tiff hi i D6E.S Tt-Ve 1H ~ti+ A-ME nI- bwierJT *P ROx/lOE-S M A-ftrriii A RA £ C W/va1 » S M -FOR &eI(EF.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Martin entitled to production of documents, did a Brady violation occur when favorable material evidence was withheld/discarded, was Martin entitled to a new trial in federal court for Brady violation, do Brady violations provide Martin a mechanism for relief under the 6th Amendment

Docket Entries

2024-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent Dexter Payne to respond filed.
2024-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Dexter Payne
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Lawrence Martin
Lawrence Martin — Petitioner