No. 23-6995
Rosaura Strous v. Superior Court of California, Yuma County
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights disability-discrimination disability-rights due-process employment-law judicial-procedure sexual-discrimination sexual-harassment standing
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question 1) What claims did you raise to the court below?
Claims of sexual harassment that have not been addressed. Sexual
discrimination as well as violation of my rights due to a disability.
Question 2) What do you think the court below did wrong?
The court made a decision without allowing the appellant to be
heard.
It is a violation of the appellant's rights and sexual harassment is a
serious allegation that was not addressed and simply dismissed as
frivolous.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What claims did you raise to the court below?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2023-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Rosaura Strous
Rosaura Strous — Petitioner