1. Did the federalcourt's ruling on Mosley's Ineffective
equal protectionAssistance of Counsel claim deny Mosley
where the court had before itan evidentiary record to support
Mosley's claim, but ignored it?

2. Was defense counsel Ineffectivein his pretrial, trial and,
post trial conduct? The investigative phasetrial phase and,
post conviction assistance. This, in violation of the peti
tioner s Sixth and FourteenthAmendment Rights under the
United States Constitution.

3. Should the federalcourt have allowed the claims designated
-l1) ~ _g(6) " E(l) - and E(2) to be viewedon their merits as,
state court which caused the it was the erred ruling of the
alleged default of the claims?

4. Did the federalcourt ruling on Mosley's Trial Court's Abuse
of Discretion claim, deny Mosley's equal protection andDue
Process rights? The evidentiary
trial court's conclusion thatrecord does show that the
pro se motion and counsel's
motion were not the same in
include claims of Prosecutorialcontent as; pro se motion did
Misconduct and Police Misconduct . Not allowing an
claims is theargument for the record on said
reason for claim of Court Abuse ofDiscretion.

Ineffective-Assistance-of-Counsel