No. 23-6477
Jamaile L. Huey v. United States
Tags: borden-v-united-states crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-jurisdiction fourth-circuit mens-rea robbery robbery-statute sentencing sentencing-guidelines violent-crime
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a state robbery conviction, sustained under a statute without a specified mens rea for the element of violence or threat of violence, but with a specific mens rea for the theft element of the offense, is a "crime of violence" under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a), in light of this Court's decision in Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state robbery conviction, sustained under a statute without a specified mens rea for the element of violence or threat of violence, but with a specific mens rea for the theft element of the offense, is a 'crime of violence' under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a), in light of this Court's decision in Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021)
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Jamaile Huey
Jonathan David Byrne — Federal Pub Defender S. Dist., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent