Michelle A. Ferrell v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Why did the Federal Circuit Court ignore Petitioner's MSPB case regarding her IRA. Instead
MSBP case No. DA-1221-21-0228-W-1 was decided by AJ Mehan on January 24, 2022.
1. Why did FC not allow Petitioners rehearing/rehearing en banc; due to the fact that the Defendar
have been discriminating against employees for years and this case affects all employees.
2. Why didn't the FC Court allow Petitioner, Ferrell, to have MSPB as a Defendant.
3. Why was MSPB AJ allowed to suspend, cancel, and change documents which was
illegal; yet FC Court ignored the facts.
4. Why did FC disregard most of Petitioner's proof the same as the MSPB AJ ignored evidence?
5. I proved Retaliation in my Briefs; June 27, 2022, October & November 2022, yet it was ignored
IAW 5 USC. 1221 (e) Chavez v Dept of Veterans Affairs, 120 M.S.P.R. 285 27 (2013)
6. Why didn't FC follow their own rules and give Ferrell a fair review of her case instead of siding
with the Federal Agency?
7. Every Agency who reviewed Ferrell's case sided with HUD regardless if HUD was lying; Why
didn't FC review Ferrell's briefs etc., IAW Rules of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit?
8. Why do MSPB, EEOC, District Court of Columbia and the US. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit all favor the Federal Agencies? Although a person is pro-se, they should be given a chance
to prove themself.
9. Why won't the above Agencies appoint pro-se Petitioner with a Lawyer?
10. Can the Supreme Court review Petitioner's 2022-1487 documents? Especially see the Affidavit
of Ferrell's Supervisor, Kimone Paley, Document 71-2 April 11,2023.
Why did the Federal Circuit Court ignore Petitioner's MSPB case regarding her IRA