No. 23-600

Dan Robert, et al. v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: adverse-effects armed-forces constitutional-rights covid-19-vaccine experimental-injection experimental-medical-treatment judicial-review medical-coercion military-service separation-of-powers vaccine-mandate
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the unlawful implementation of the harmful Covid vaccine mandate in the Armed Services properly evades judicial review based on repeal of the mandate and separation of a service member who is subject to recall to duty.

2. Whether it is proper and authorized for a court of appeals to engage in factfinding, while going outside of the record, to dismiss service members' appeal without reaching its merits.

3. Whether the government may properly force citizens to receive an experimental gene-modifying injection, recognized in the medical literature as causing severe adverse effects.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the unlawful implementation of the harmful Covid vaccine mandate in the Armed Services properly evades judicial review

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Austin, Lloyd, et al. to respond filed.
2023-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 4, 2024)

Attorneys

Austin, Lloyd, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Dan Robert, et al.
Andrew L. Schlafly — Petitioner