No. 23-5573
Lashun Tracy Tinnen v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance legal-precedent performance-evaluation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-test
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
In light of the facts of this case, was the defense counsel ineffective in light of this court's precedent in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the defense counsel ineffective under Strickland v. Washington?
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Lashun Tracy Tinnen
Lashun Tracy Tinnen — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent