No. 23-427
Domino’s Pizza, LLC v. Edmond Carmona, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: civil-procedure commerce-clause delivery-drivers federal-arbitration-act interstate-commerce local-delivery standing statutory-interpretation transportation-law workers
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour Jurisdiction ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour Jurisdiction ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-04-19
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether local delivery drivers—i.e., workers who make in-state deliveries of goods in response to instate orders, and play no role in transporting those goods across borders—are nevertheless "engaged in foreign or interstate commerce" for purposes of Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether local delivery drivers are 'engaged in foreign or interstate commerce' under the Federal Arbitration Act
Docket Entries
2024-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2024-01-03
Reply of petitioner Domino’s Pizza, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-20
Brief of respondents Edmond Carmona, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 8, 2024.
2023-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 7, 2023 to January 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-07
Response Requested. (Due December 7, 2023)
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-26
Waiver of right of respondent Edmond Carmona, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 22, 2023)
Attorneys
Domino’s Pizza, LLC
Courtney Gilligan Saleski — DLA Piper LLP, Petitioner
Edmond Carmona, Abraham Mendoza, and Roger Nogueria, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Aashish Y. Desai — Desai Law Firm, P.C., Respondent